def flow_judge_prompt_mt_bench_without_ref(question, options, answer, gold):
    return [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": f"""# GOAL
Your job is to evaluate a task carried out by an AI system powered by a large \
language model.

You will be provided with the inputs and output of the task, as well as the evaluation criteria \
and scoring rubric. Your task is to evaluate the output of the AI system based on the evaluation \
criteria and scoring rubric provided.

# INPUT
Below are the inputs required for performing the task:
<inputs>
{question}
</inputs>

# OUTPUT
Below is the output of the task:
<output>
{answer}
</output>

# EVALUATION CRITERIA AND SCORING RUBRIC
Here are the evaluation criteria and the rubric that you need to use for evaluating the task:
<evaluation_criteria>
How well the response answers the question?
</evaluation_criteria>

<scoring_rubric>
- Score 1: The response completely fails to answer the question.
- Score 2: The response barely answers the question.
- Score 3: The response partially answers the question.
- Score 4: The response mostly answers the question.
- Score 5: The response completely answers the question.
</scoring_rubric>

# INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE EVALUATION
1. Understand the task and criteria: Familiarize yourself with the task to be evaluated. \
Review the evaluation criteria and scoring rubric to understand the different levels of \
performance and the descriptions for each score.
2. Review the inputs and output: Look at the inputs provided for the task. Examine the output \
generated from completing the task.
3. Compare output to score descriptions: Compare the output against the criteria and score \
descriptions in the scoring rubric. For each criterion,decide which description best matches the \
output.
4. After comparing the output to the score descriptions, pay attention to the small details that \
might impact the final score that you assign. Sometimes a small difference can dictate the final \
score.
5. Write verbal feedback justifying your evaluation that includes a detailed rationale, referring \
to specific aspects of the output and comparing them to the rubric.
6. Assign a final score based on the scoring rubric.

## FORMAT FOR THE EVALUATION
- Write the verbal feedback inside <feedback> tags without any additional surrounding text.
- Write the numeric score inside <score> tags, without any additional surrounding text and always \
after the feedback.

Please accurately evaluate the task. Strictly adhere to the evaluation criteria and rubric.""",
        }
    ]


def flow_judge_prompt_mt_bench_with_ref(question, options, answer, gold):
    return [
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": f"""# GOAL
Your job is to evaluate a task carried out by an AI system powered by a large \
language model.

You will be provided with the inputs and output of the task, as well as the evaluation criteria \
and scoring rubric. Your task is to evaluate the output of the AI system based on the evaluation \
criteria and scoring rubric provided.

# INPUT
Below are the inputs required for performing the task:
<inputs>
{question}
</inputs>

# OUTPUT
Below is the output of the task:
<output>
{answer}
</output>

# EVALUATION CRITERIA AND SCORING RUBRIC
Here are the evaluation criteria and the rubric that you need to use for evaluating the task:
<evaluation_criteria>
How well the response answers the question, the reference answer is:
{gold}
</evaluation_criteria>

<scoring_rubric>
- Score 1: The response completely fails to answer the question.
- Score 2: The response barely answers the question.
- Score 3: The response partially answers the question.
- Score 4: The response mostly answers the question.
- Score 5: The response completely answers the question.
</scoring_rubric>

# INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE EVALUATION
1. Understand the task and criteria: Familiarize yourself with the task to be evaluated. \
Review the evaluation criteria and scoring rubric to understand the different levels of \
performance and the descriptions for each score.
2. Review the inputs and output: Look at the inputs provided for the task. Examine the output \
generated from completing the task.
3. Compare output to score descriptions: Compare the output against the criteria and score \
descriptions in the scoring rubric. For each criterion,decide which description best matches the \
output.
4. After comparing the output to the score descriptions, pay attention to the small details that \
might impact the final score that you assign. Sometimes a small difference can dictate the final \
score.
5. Write verbal feedback justifying your evaluation that includes a detailed rationale, referring \
to specific aspects of the output and comparing them to the rubric.
6. Assign a final score based on the scoring rubric.

## FORMAT FOR THE EVALUATION
- Write the verbal feedback inside <feedback> tags without any additional surrounding text.
- Write the numeric score inside <score> tags, without any additional surrounding text and always \
after the feedback.

Please accurately evaluate the task. Strictly adhere to the evaluation criteria and rubric.""",
        }
    ]
